Discussion:
[m-dev.] adding a new talk
Zoltan Somogyi
2018-10-21 13:03:07 UTC
Permalink
After I gave a talk on argument packing at YesLogic last friday (oct 12),
I added the pdf of the talk to the www repository. It hasn't turned up
on mercurylang.org, so I see that the website has to be updated manually.
Who is supposed to be doing that now, and could he please do the update?

Zoltan.
Julien Fischer
2018-10-21 13:10:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Zoltan Somogyi
After I gave a talk on argument packing at YesLogic last friday (oct 12),
I added the pdf of the talk to the www repository. It hasn't turned up
on mercurylang.org, so I see that the website has to be updated manually.
Yes, it needs to be updated manually.
Post by Zoltan Somogyi
Who is supposed to be doing that now, and could he please do the update?
I've just updated it.

Julien.
Zoltan Somogyi
2018-10-21 13:50:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Julien Fischer
Post by Zoltan Somogyi
After I gave a talk on argument packing at YesLogic last friday (oct 12),
I added the pdf of the talk to the www repository. It hasn't turned up
on mercurylang.org, so I see that the website has to be updated manually.
Yes, it needs to be updated manually.
Do you have a guess as to how many manual updates worth of work would it be
to automate this process?
Post by Julien Fischer
Post by Zoltan Somogyi
Who is supposed to be doing that now, and could he please do the update?
I've just updated it.
Thank you.

Zoltan.
Julien Fischer
2018-10-22 06:43:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Zoltan Somogyi
Post by Julien Fischer
Post by Zoltan Somogyi
After I gave a talk on argument packing at YesLogic last friday (oct 12),
I added the pdf of the talk to the www repository. It hasn't turned up
on mercurylang.org, so I see that the website has to be updated manually.
Yes, it needs to be updated manually.
Do you have a guess as to how many manual updates worth of work would it be
to automate this process?
In one sense the update process is very quick, git --pull followed by
make. We could set up a cron job to do that; the downside is that the
above will leave the website in a broken state if someone screws
something up. There aren't (currently) enough changes to the website to
warrant writing something that would handle the second case.

(In this case, you probably should have followed the documented review
policy for Mercury which requires that *all* web site changes be posted
for review; that way, (1) I would have been aware of it and (2) the
mistakes in your commit would have been caught before you pushed.)

Julien.
Zoltan Somogyi
2018-10-22 07:25:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Julien Fischer
In one sense the update process is very quick, git --pull followed by
make. We could set up a cron job to do that; the downside is that the
above will leave the website in a broken state if someone screws
something up. There aren't (currently) enough changes to the website to
warrant writing something that would handle the second case.
(In this case, you probably should have followed the documented review
policy for Mercury which requires that *all* web site changes be posted
for review; that way, (1) I would have been aware of it and (2) the
mistakes in your commit would have been caught before you pushed.)
Sorry about that. It has been so long since I added anything to www
that I forgot ...

Zoltan.

Loading...